CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — Since their introduction in 1996, genetically engineered, often called genetically modified, feed crops have become an increasing component of livestock diets. Today, more than 95 percent of U.S. food-producing animals consume feed containing GE crops.
Studies that involve feeding GE crops to livestock are used to evaluate the safety of these crops. Recently, University of California, Davis researchers reinforced the consistency of these studies in an unprecedented review article that examines nearly 30 years worth of livestock-feeding studies, representing more than 100 billion animals.
In the review, posted online in the Journal of Animal Science, Alison Van Eenennaam, Cooperative Extension specialist in animal biotechnology at the University of California, Davis, and research assistant Amy Young examine feeding data from 1983 (13 years before GE crops were introduced) through 2011 (when GE feed use exceeded 90 percent).
The review also examines the composition of products derived from animals fed diets containing GE feeds.
The researchers concluded feeding livestock diets that contain genetically engineered (GE) crops has no impact on the health or productivity of those animals. The article documents evidence that the performance and health of food-producing animals fed GE crops are comparable with those of animals fed non-GE crops.
No difference
“No study has revealed any differences in the nutritional profile of animal products derived from GE-fed animals,” state the authors.
The review, Prevalence and impacts of genetically engineered feedstuffs on livestock populations, will appear in print and open-access in the October 2014 Journal of Animal Science.
Anyone can read
Due to the high level of interest in the article, the American Society of Animal Science has elected to make the full article immediately available in open-access form at www.asas.org.
“The scientific evidence indicates clearly that the health, wellbeing, and productivity of animals consuming GE feeds are at least comparable to those of animals consuming conventional feeds,” wrote Dr. Gregory S. Lewis, editor-in-chief of the Journal of Animal Science.
“I believe that information in this peer-reviewed article is essential for open-minded discussions of GE feeds and foods, and we have made this information freely available to the public.”
The writer of this article is clearly in denial. There is all kinds of evidence of human and animal health risks. This is just a small sample: http://www.collective-evolution.com/2014/04/08/10-scientific-studies-proving-gmos-can-be-harmful-to-human-health/